Join MultiplyOpen a Free ShopSign InHelp
MultiplyLogo
SEARCH
Blog EntrySep 8, '09 2:36 AM
for everyone

 

 

These remarks (Obama back to school speach) hardly strikes me as the indoctrination (socialism) that some parents feared the President was going to make and that so worried them they would not allow their children to listen



Prepared Remarks of President Barack Obama
Back to School Event

Arlington, Virginia
September 8, 2009
 

The President: Hello everyone – how’s everybody doing today? I’m here with students at Wakefield High School in Arlington, Virginia. And we’ve got students tuning in from all across America, kindergarten through twelfth grade. I’m glad you all could join us today. 
I know that for many of you, today is the first day of school. And for those of you in kindergarten, or starting middle or high school, it’s your first day in a new school, so it’s understandable if you’re a little nervous. I imagine there are some seniors out there who are feeling pretty good right now, with just one more year to go. And no matter what grade you’re in, some of you are probably wishing it were still summer, and you could’ve stayed in bed just a little longer this morning.
I know that feeling. When I was young, my family lived in Indonesia for a few years, and my mother didn’t have the money to send me where all the American kids went to school. So she decided to teach me extra lessons herself, Monday through Friday – at 4:30 in the morning.   
Now I wasn’t too happy about getting up that early. A lot of times, I’d fall asleep right there at the kitchen table. But whenever I’d complain, my mother would just give me one of those looks and say, "This is no picnic for me either, buster."
So I know some of you are still adjusting to being back at school. But I’m here today because I have something important to discuss with you. I’m here because I want to talk with you about your education and what’s expected of all of you in this new school year. 
Now I’ve given a lot of speeches about education. And I’ve talked a lot about responsibility.
I’ve talked about your teachers’ responsibility for inspiring you, and pushing you to learn. 
I’ve talked about your parents’ responsibility for making sure you stay on track, and get your homework done, and don’t spend every waking hour in front of the TV or with that Xbox. 
I’ve talked a lot about your government’s responsibility for setting high standards, supporting teachers and principals, and turning around schools that aren’t working where students aren’t getting the opportunities they deserve. 
But at the end of the day, we can have the most dedicated teachers, the most supportive parents, and the best schools in the world – and none of it will matter unless all of you fulfill your responsibilities. Unless you show up to those schools; pay attention to those teachers; listen to your parents, grandparents and other adults; and put in the hard work it takes to succeed. 
And that’s what I want to focus on today: the responsibility each of you has for your education. I want to start with the responsibility you have to yourself. 
Every single one of you has something you’re good at. Every single one of you has something to offer. And you have a responsibility to yourself to discover what that is. That’s the opportunity an education can provide. 
Maybe you could be a good writer – maybe even good enough to write a book or articles in a newspaper – but you might not know it until you write a paper for your English class. Maybe you could be an innovator or an inventor – maybe even good enough to come up with the next iPhone or a new medicine or vaccine – but you might not know it until you do a project for your science class. Maybe you could be a mayor or a Senator or a Supreme Court Justice, but you might not know that until you join student government or the debate team.
And no matter what you want to do with your life – I guarantee that you’ll need an education to do it. You want to be a doctor, or a teacher, or a police officer? You want to be a nurse or an architect, a lawyer or a member of our military? You’re going to need a good education for every single one of those careers. You can’t drop out of school and just drop into a good job. You’ve got to work for it and train for it and learn for it.
And this isn’t just important for your own life and your own future. What you make of your education will decide nothing less than the future of this country. What you’re learning in school today will determine whether we as a nation can meet our greatest challenges in the future. 
You’ll need the knowledge and problem-solving skills you learn in science and math to cure diseases like cancer and AIDS, and to develop new energy technologies and protect our environment. You’ll need the insights and critical thinking skills you gain in history and social studies to fight poverty and homelessness, crime and discrimination, and make our nation more fair and more free. You’ll need the creativity and ingenuity you develop in all your classes to build new companies that will create new jobs and boost our economy. 
We need every single one of you to develop your talents, skills and intellect so you can help solve our most difficult problems. If you don’t do that – if you quit on school – you’re not just quitting on yourself, you’re quitting on your country. 
Now I know it’s not always easy to do well in school. I know a lot of you have challenges in your lives right now that can make it hard to focus on your schoolwork.
I get it. I know what that’s like. My father left my family when I was two years old, and I was raised by a single mother who struggled at times to pay the bills and wasn’t always able to give us things the other kids had. There were times when I missed having a father in my life. There were times when I was lonely and felt like I didn’t fit in. 
So I wasn’t always as focused as I should have been. I did some things I’m not proud of, and got in more trouble than I should have. And my life could have easily taken a turn for the worse. 
But I was fortunate. I got a lot of second chances and had the opportunity to go to college, and law school, and follow my dreams. My wife, our First Lady Michelle Obama, has a similar story. Neither of her parents had gone to college, and they didn’t have much. But they worked hard, and she worked hard, so that she could go to the best schools in this country.
Some of you might not have those advantages. Maybe you don’t have adults in your life who give you the support that you need. Maybe someone in your family has lost their job, and there’s not enough money to go around. Maybe you live in a neighborhood where you don’t feel safe, or have friends who are pressuring you to do things you know aren’t right. 
But at the end of the day, the circumstances of your life – what you look like, where you come from, how much money you have, what you’ve got going on at home – that’s no excuse for neglecting your homework or having a bad attitude. That’s no excuse for talking back to your teacher, or cutting class, or dropping out of school. That’s no excuse for not trying. 
Where you are right now doesn’t have to determine where you’ll end up. No one’s written your destiny for you. Here in America, you write your own destiny. You make your own future. 
That’s what young people like you are doing every day, all across America. 
Young people like Jazmin Perez, from Roma, Texas. Jazmin didn’t speak English when she first started school. Hardly anyone in her hometown went to college, and neither of her parents had gone either. But she worked hard, earned good grades, got a scholarship to Brown University, and is now in graduate school, studying public health, on her way to being Dr. Jazmin Perez.
I’m thinking about Andoni Schultz, from Los Altos, California, who’s fought brain cancer since he was three. He’s endured all sorts of treatments and surgeries, one of which affected his memory, so it took him much longer – hundreds of extra hours – to do his schoolwork. But he never fell behind, and he’s headed to college this fall. 
And then there’s Shantell Steve, from my hometown of Chicago, Illinois. Even when bouncing from foster home to foster home in the toughest neighborhoods, she managed to get a job at a local health center; start a program to keep young people out of gangs; and she’s on track to graduate high school with honors and go on to college.
Jazmin, Andoni and Shantell aren’t any different from any of you. They faced challenges in their lives just like you do. But they refused to give up. They chose to take responsibility for their education and set goals for themselves. And I expect all of you to do the same. 
That’s why today, I’m calling on each of you to set your own goals for your education – and to do everything you can to meet them. Your goal can be something as simple as doing all your homework, paying attention in class, or spending time each day reading a book. Maybe you’ll decide to get involved in an extracurricular activity, or volunteer in your community. Maybe you’ll decide to stand up for kids who are being teased or bullied because of who they are or how they look, because you believe, like I do, that all kids deserve a safe environment to study and learn. Maybe you’ll decide to take better care of yourself so you can be more ready to learn. And along those lines, I hope you’ll all wash your hands a lot, and stay home from school when you don’t feel well, so we can keep people from getting the flu this fall and winter.
Whatever you resolve to do, I want you to commit to it. I want you to really work at it. 
I know that sometimes, you get the sense from TV that you can be rich and successful without any hard work -- that your ticket to success is through rapping or basketball or being a reality TV star, when chances are, you’re not going to be any of those things. 
But the truth is, being successful is hard. You won’t love every subject you study. You won’t click with every teacher. Not every homework assignment will seem completely relevant to your life right this minute. And you won’t necessarily succeed at everything the first time you try.
That’s OK.  Some of the most successful people in the world are the ones who’ve had the most failures. JK Rowling’s first Harry Potter book was rejected twelve times before it was finally published. Michael Jordan was cut from his high school basketball team, and he lost hundreds of games and missed thousands of shots during his career. But he once said, "I have failed over and over and over again in my life. And that is why I succeed." 
These people succeeded because they understand that you can’t let your failures define you – you have to let them teach you. You have to let them show you what to do differently next time. If you get in trouble, that doesn’t mean you’re a troublemaker, it means you need to try harder to behave. If you get a bad grade, that doesn’t mean you’re stupid, it just means you need to spend more time studying. 
No one’s born being good at things, you become good at things through hard work. You’re not a varsity athlete the first time you play a new sport. You don’t hit every note the first time you sing a song. You’ve got to practice. It’s the same with your schoolwork. You might have to do a math problem a few times before you get it right, or read something a few times before you understand it, or do a few drafts of a paper before it’s good enough to hand in. 
Don’t be afraid to ask questions. Don’t be afraid to ask for help when you need it. I do that every day. Asking for help isn’t a sign of weakness, it’s a sign of strength. It shows you have the courage to admit when you don’t know something, and to learn something new. So find an adult you trust – a parent, grandparent or teacher; a coach or counselor – and ask them to help you stay on track to meet your goals. 
And even when you’re struggling, even when you’re discouraged, and you feel like other people have given up on you – don’t ever give up on yourself. Because when you give up on yourself, you give up on your country.
The story of America isn’t about people who quit when things got tough. It’s about people who kept going, who tried harder, who loved their country too much to do anything less than their best. 
It’s the story of students who sat where you sit 250 years ago, and went on to wage a revolution and found this nation. Students who sat where you sit 75 years ago who overcame a Depression and won a world war; who fought for civil rights and put a man on the moon. Students who sat where you sit 20 years ago who founded Google, Twitter and Facebook and changed the way we communicate with each other.
So today, I want to ask you, what’s your contribution going to be? What problems are you going to solve? What discoveries will you make? What will a president who comes here in twenty or fifty or one hundred years say about what all of you did for this country?  
Your families, your teachers, and I are doing everything we can to make sure you have the education you need to answer these questions. I’m working hard to fix up your classrooms and get you the books, equipment and computers you need to learn. But you’ve got to do your part too. So I expect you to get serious this year. I expect you to put your best effort into everything you do. I expect great things from each of you. So don’t let us down – don’t let your family or your country or yourself down. Make us all proud. I know you can do it.
Thank you, God bless you, and God bless America.
 
 
The red scare. Mere mention of the politically loaded phrase conjures up images of masses of people assembling with pitchforks and parading “anti-American” individuals before a committee in the Senate or House of Representatives.These days, President Obama has become the chief target of a witch hunt. Socialism, and communism are words that today are bantered about by the right wing of the GOP with as little regard as to what it applies to much like Goldberg’s alleged liberal fascist labelers. The term red scare in effect refers to the fear that many in the western world had in regards to communism, the term red pertaining to the red flag of the Soviet Union. Even though the red scare for most purposes ended by the late 1950’s it continued well into the 1960’s and in some ways to present day politics.
 
Red-baiting is the act of accusing someone, or some group, of being communist , socialist  or, in a broader sense, of being significantly more leftist at their core than they may appear at the outset. The term is used mainly with the intention of discrediting the individual's or organization's political views as dishonest and/or haphazard. The implication in red-baiting is usually that the target represents an ill-intentioned external force which has no proper place in a given political party , coalition , or union

146 CommentsChronological   Reverse   Threaded
trumain wrote on Sep 8, '09
Since you are obviously not real bright permit me to enlighten you. When the lesson plan was sent to principals on September 3, 2000 it read like a campaign advertisement for “the One” without and discernable inspiration for the kids above wash your hands and keep trying. All the rest was praise on high to Obama. As these talking points were all parents had to go on the questions started…The talking points have been revised twice since the White House finally posted the text after noon on Monday. Amazingly it looks in sharp contrast to the original talking points…How many times in all the criticism do you think that got re-writen?
The last “ruler” that took over large industry, the banks, health care, bankrupt his country…BUT…He did get the trains to run on time. And he was not a communists, no Benito Mussolini was no communists…A despotic Fascist Yes, but not a communists!
Educated Americans remember Obama’s campaign pledge to the effect that America is the greatest nation in the world, and he intended to change that! They also know that capitalism and free markets made America the strongest and richest country in the world.
And they don’t want to lose that to a Fascist Oligarchy as demonstrated by Obama and the admitted Communists he surrounds himself with.
goodstuff4u wrote on Sep 8, '09
trumain said
the lesson plan

http://blog.heritage.org/2009/09/03/politicizing-the-department-of-education/


http://www.ed.gov/teachers/how/lessons/prek-6.pdf


 


And so, my fellow americans: ask not what your country can do for you - ask what you can do for your country. John F. Kennedy

 

pissycat wrote on Sep 8, '09
Also: I recently read a column that pointed out that MANY Presidents before Obama have directly addressed remarks to schoolchildren, with no apparent intention of indoctrination/brainwashing/whatever...AND with no hue and cry arising as a result of those actions.

And that column also pointed out that Bush2 had been [infamously] in the act of reading to schoolchildren at the very moment that "9/11" went down.
pissycat wrote on Sep 8, '09
Re this: "When the lesson plan was sent to principals on September 3, 2000 it read like a campaign advertisement for “the One” without and discernible inspiration for the kids above wash your hands and keep trying. All the rest was praise on high to Obama."

Aside from the typo regarding the year (it's obviously not 2000), I'm scratching my head. I have not seen the text of such a "lesson plan," and if one had been sent out, and if it had reinforced the conservatives' agenda, then it would have been widely-published, along with the accusations of 'brain-washing."

It is also pretty-typical of extremist politicos (on both side of the fence) to characterize anyone who doesn't agree with them as being "stupid," as was done to you. It's happened to me, too: When I was at the university's freshman orientation in 1970, a member of the SDS told me, when I expressed a lack of enthusiasm for campus riots over the war, that, "If you're not part of the solution, then you're part of the problem!" I took that as a personal threat. And his behavior had the opposite effect that he'd intended, as it tended to make me lean more to the Right than I might have otherwise. At the moment, the conservatives, IMO, pose the greater threat to progress and growth in the USA, but the fact is that both sides can get pretty "wack-a-do."
goodstuff4u wrote on Sep 8, '09
pissycat - thanks for the great comments and the link
msesth3r wrote on Sep 8, '09
For the most part, I agree ... too long and too much for one sitting. In the words of the California Senator, "I'll be back". :)
wellhell2 wrote on Sep 8, '09
goes to show the amount of time and energy the right wing neocon minority will use to spread their propaganda... laughable to say the least.
adrisanitarium wrote on Sep 8, '09, edited on Sep 8, '09
I'm not the biggest Obama fan in the room - I hope that I never become a defender of the power and the status quo!

BUT that doesn't mean that attacking EVERYTHING Obama says or does makes any sense, either. A stay in school message is a no-brainer. Even the biggest Obama critic should not feel compelled to swing at every single pitch.

It's a shame that people let politics - especially politics at a distance, like we see on blogs on the internet, give them an excuse to act like subhuman jerks.

Trumain's comments below are a good example of this - "It is obvious you are not real bright" is a HORRIBLE thing to say to someone, and I doubt he'd say it to your face or my face. For some reason, hiding anonymously behind one's keyboard seems to give some folks permission to act like that.

When I read the language of the speech, all the hand-wringing and Hitler Youth references seemed pretty funny... Thanks for great pics to accompany this blog, by the way!
goodstuff4u wrote on Sep 8, '09
right wing neocon minority will use to spread their propaganda.
goodstuff4u wrote on Sep 8, '09
BUT that doesn't mean that attacking EVERYTHING Obama says or does makes any sense, either. A stay in school message is a no-brainer. Even the biggest Obama critic should not feel compelled to swing at every single pitch.
this whole thing is just weird. why would students need permission to watch/listen to the president of the US
bastiat2 wrote on Sep 8, '09
Since when is calling a marxist a marxist red baiting?
wb8rcr wrote on Sep 8, '09
The message Obama posted on whitehouse.gov yesterday was excellent. There is no reason any parent should be concerned about his child hearing that message.

However, I am convinced that without all the controversy, the message would have been a lot different. Obama may well be a socialist, and totally unprepared to be president of the United States, and a crook, but he isn't totally stupid. Occasionally he gets something right.
adrisanitarium wrote on Sep 8, '09
Since when is calling a marxist a marxist red baiting?
When the particular act being railed against is NOT Marxist, for starters.

C'mon. You're a smart guy. You know you don't have to swing at every pitch.

Getting up in arms about a speech that sounds like something Elmo might give undermines Obama's critics' many legitimate gripes.
bertthemensachicken wrote on Sep 8, '09
Paranoia... that's why many fear the presidents speech to school children. They are paranoid about ANYTHING President Obama does or says and are determine to make our President fail. How can that be helpful to our nation?

How can a speech that encourages the young to study and learn and make their own decisions be considered as something bad. Well you can be sure someone will think it's bad.

conservatress wrote on Sep 8, '09, edited on Sep 8, '09
The issue should not be that he is giving a speech, it should be the first set of questions issued by the Dept of Ed that made the focus of indoctrination vs. education.

What is lost in the media coverage is that the Dept of Ed had an agenda which they quickly backed off of and replaced with less inflamatory questions and activities. The media and Obama has redefined this by placing the emplasis on the objectors who don't want Obama bringing politics into the classroom when the issue was the Department of Education follow up activities that did just that.

The issue is being redefined but what cannot be lost is that over the objections of concerned parents the agenda changed.

adrisanitarium wrote on Sep 8, '09, edited on Sep 8, '09
The issue should not be that he is giving a speech, it should be the first set of questions issued by the Dept of Ed that made the focus of indoctrination vs. education.

What is lost in the media coverage is that the Dept of Ed had an agenda which they quickly backed off of and replaced with less inflamatory questions and activities. The media and Obama has redefined this by placing the emplasis on the objectors who don't want Obama bringing politics into the classroom when the issue was the Department of Education follow up activities that did just that.

The issue is being redefined but what cannot be lost is that over the objections of concerned parents the agenda changed.

In that case, the controversy should have ended and the threats of pulling kids out of school quelled when they pulled the lesson plan suggestion, right?

This was a trap by the White House: "How can we get the Republicans to come out AGAINST a Stay in School speech?" The GOP fell for it. The Right got played...
mistere123 wrote on Sep 8, '09
Well, I think it's cool that he's addressing students to do well in school. I think every President should do the same. With Obama being black, he serves as an example to African Americans, and people from ALL races and backgrounds, that anyone can achieve great heights by doing well in school. Nobody should feel inferior to anyone else because of their race, sex, or background.
conservatress wrote on Sep 8, '09
this whole thing is just weird. why would students need permission to watch/listen to the president of the US
What I find unusual is that every newscast on TV and radio that I saw this morning emphasized that the program was not mandatory. But not because there is a 10th amendment, they sounded incredulous that it wasn't mandatory.

It's not like this is a government program schools can elect to not carry, it is a choice to show it.
bastiat2 wrote on Sep 8, '09
When the particular act being railed against is NOT Marxist, for starters.

C'mon. You're a smart guy. You know you don't have to swing at every pitch.

Getting up in arms about a speech that sounds like something Elmo might give undermines Obama's critics' many legitimate gripes.
Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean they (the marxists) aren't out to get me. With the Incompetent-in-Chief It is an accumulation of collectivist programs that I oppose. I would prefer he address the falling dollar, which his programs are exacerbating, rather than the students. Do I trust him?......certainly not....he is a politician.
conservatress wrote on Sep 8, '09
In that case, the controversy should have ended and the threats of pulling kids out of school quelled when they pulled the lesson plan suggestion, right?
Yes it should have. But when the media gets to frame the argument and conceals facts you can't have an informed discussion of the issues... most people didn't know the lesson plans were changed. On the other hand it was only then that the word "optional" came into play. The program was being driven by the ED as though it were to be part of the curicculum, not an option.

bertthemensachicken wrote on Sep 8, '09, edited on Sep 8, '09

Truth...truth... truth... and Facts...facts... facts... It seems everyone knows them, and like snowflakes, no two are the same. Why is that? Could it be that we each interpret the truth and facts differently to match our own preconceived mindset?



goodstuff4u wrote on Sep 8, '09

Truth...truth... truth... and Facts...facts... facts... It seems everyone knows them, and like snowflakes, no two are the same. Why is that? Could it be that we each interpret the truth and facts differently to match our own preconceived mindset?



easy to play parot
sweetadolead wrote on Sep 8, '09
I have no issue with a President or Leader talking to students about the importance of a solid education and personal responsibility in making it happen. He is known as and extreme left Democrat so of course there are those who question his message.

The original releases from the White House about what he was going to discussion and the outline that was to be released to schools contains or did contain prep questioning that some felt was leading because most teachers are liberal and many teachers have stiffled any discussion other than that of liberal thinking. There is rarely any real dialogue that isn't one sided about the issues in our educational institutions - Kindergarten thru College.

My husband and daughter are teachers who are conservative. The liberal views with the union and the assumption that everyone is liberal permeates the culture. They keep their mouths shut to keep the peace because God forbid you disagree or didn't vote for the Dem candidate. During Election time, the kids were infiltrated with Obama good, McCain bad and we saw it all the news of children being chastised by teachers for not agreeing or having a military family or expressing a conservative thought.

Only 28% strongly agree that he is doing a good job and 52% do not support him at this point. He has built a lot of mistrust in a short time due to his support of bringing this country into massive debt beyond measure and his promises of transparency is non-existent - smoke and mirrors, slight of hand.
booboosoo wrote on Sep 8, '09
You are MOST welcome.

It was a good message but really How DARE he tell children the path their lives take depend on THEM!!
*rolls eyes*
jadedruid wrote on Sep 8, '09
I think this is a statement about the down fall of society. When people feel that encouraging their children to be truant rather then listen to a speech about staying in school and doing their homework. I find it no different then feeling people who are unemployed should allowed to die because they don't have health insurance. When people talk about the debt that Obama has supposedly enforced on us they need to ask why the country got in this shape to begin with. The worst recession since the Great Depression began back in 2007, Obama isn't the root of this evil, he inherited it from George Bush.
goodstuff4u wrote on Sep 8, '09
<<== wants to grow up and become a communist just like Obama
trumain wrote on Sep 8, '09
jadedruid...History evades you doesn't it... The worst economy since the Great Depression was caused by Democrat Jimmy Carter!
conservatress wrote on Sep 8, '09
The worst recession since the Great Depression
It's the worst recession since 1979-1982 and began fourth quarter 2008..

The stock market decline began in May 2008, plummeting in Sept. 2008. The housing and credit declines began July 2008. It may seem like 2007, but that is history revisionism.

goodstuff4u wrote on Sep 8, '09
think this is a statement about the down fall of society.
the story has been retold a bunch of times - just another phase - we will get through this
meathookcook wrote on Sep 8, '09
trumain said
History evades you doesn't it... The worst economy since the Great Depression was caused by Democrat Jimmy Carter!
Lets not get hung up on facts now!
conservatress wrote on Sep 8, '09
It was a good message but really How DARE he tell children the path their lives take depend on THEM!!
Quite ironic for the big government statist who doesn't believe adults should be responsible for their own health care, to decide to join a union, their own retirement, to run companies, to spend their own money responsibly, and yet he encourages self detemination in children.

So to Obama personal responsibility is good in children and bad in adults?
jadedruid wrote on Sep 8, '09
trumain said
jadedruid...History evades you doesn't it... The worst economy since the Great Depression was caused by Democrat Jimmy Carter!
Sorry to disallusion you but the current GNP is lower then with Carter. Unemployment is higher then with Carter. Housing forclosures higher then with Carter. Check your statistics rather then spouting rhetoric
trumain wrote on Sep 8, '09
Jude...Carter caused the worst economy since the Great Depression...Even the little blame that the left can assign to Bush...And that is all the weak minded do...Pales in comparison!
conservatress wrote on Sep 8, '09
Ummm... you might want to check your stats. The GNP under Carter was just over $3 trillion, the US GDP never dipped below $14 trillion in the current recession.
bastiat2 wrote on Sep 8, '09
Sorry to disallusion you but the current GNP is lower then with Carter. Unemployment is higher then with Carter. Housing forclosures higher then with Carter. Check your statistics rather then spouting rhetoric
You say the economic mess was caused by Bush ...Then why will Hussein overspending two/three times as much as Bush make things better?
pissycat wrote on Sep 8, '09
msesth3r wrote "...In the words of the California Senator, 'I'll be back.' :)"

Good quip! But please allow me a small correction, as he's my Governor, not my Senator. (Sometimes we call him, "The Governator.")
kenr61 wrote on Sep 8, '09
I think this is a statement about the down fall of society. When people feel that encouraging their children to be truant rather then listen to a speech about staying in school and doing their homework. I find it no different then feeling people who are unemployed should allowed to die because they don't have health insurance. When people talk about the debt that Obama has supposedly enforced on us they need to ask why the country got in this shape to begin with. The worst recession since the Great Depression began back in 2007, Obama isn't the root of this evil, he inherited it from George Bush.
Funny thing about that debt. Did Obama create it or was it there and he finally made us responcible for paying off what we already owed? Republicans remind me so much of that old adage that we oft become what we most despise.
kenr61 wrote on Sep 8, '09
msesth3r wrote "...In the words of the California Senator, 'I'll be back.' :)"

Good quip! But please allow me a small correction, as he's my Governor, not my Senator. (Sometimes we call him, "The Governator.")
I work for the man and I can't repeat in mixed company what we call him.
conservatress wrote on Sep 8, '09
kenr61 said
Did Obama create it or was it there and he finally made us responcible for paying off what we already owed?
None of the trillion or so in spending decreased the debt, it was all added to the debt.
conservatress wrote on Sep 8, '09
kenr61 said
I work for the man and I can't repeat in mixed company what we call him.
Hopefully you'll soon be calling him the former governor.
trumain wrote on Sep 8, '09
Prissy, You have not seen a lesson or talking points and I hit a 0 instead of a 9
Here is the web site that you cannot find! http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/academic/bts.html
This is the first time in American history the D.O.E."Requested" all schools watch and use their lesson plan. Now let's see what else you do not know...How about 1991 (hope I got all the number keys right this time)...
Would you believe when the president of the United States gave a speech to schoolchildren, there were all out investigations and congressional hearings? Think this relates to Obama’s speech today? Think again – the year was 1991 and Democrats were protesting President George H.W. Bush’s address to school children!Yet, many of these same Democrats today state that conservatives are over-reacting to Obama’s campaign speech to our schoolchildren.
meathookcook wrote on Sep 8, '09, edited on Sep 8, '09
kenr61 said
Funny thing about that debt. Did Obama create it or was it there and he finally made us responcible for paying off what we already owed?
OK my head is about to explode at that logic. How does tripling in six months the debt that the Republican administration racked up over 8 years force us to pay off what we already owed. That's like saying you;re going to be forced to pay down your Visa debt by running up just as much on Mastercard, Discover and AmEx
goodstuff4u wrote on Sep 8, '09


bed time story for the kids

goodstuff4u wrote on Sep 8, '09
trumain said
This is the first time in American history the D.O.E."Requested" all schools watch and use their lesson plan. Now let's see what else you do not know...How about 1991 (hope I got all the number keys right this time)...
Additional Frequently Asked Questions (September 4)

Q: What is the speech about?

A: The goal of the speech and classroom activities is to challenge students to set goals, work hard and stay in school. This isn't a policy speech.

Q: Who came up with the idea?

A: The White House and Department of Education collaborated

Q: Is it mandatory?

A: No. The Department is inviting schools to show the address. The choice is entirely up to schools and their communities.

Q: Who did the letter announcing the speech go to?

A: The e-mail went out on Aug. 25 to districts (all 14,000+) and schools (as many of the 100,000+ public and private as we could reach).

Q: Would the administration be willing to release the speech in advance of its delivery?

A: Yes. The speech will be released on Monday and delivered on Tuesday.

Q: Has any other President done something like this?

A: In 1991 President Bush addressed the nation's students on live television from an American history classroom at Deal Junior High, in Washington, D.C.

goodstuff4u wrote on Sep 8, '09
"The hate-mongers and political pundits looking for trouble where there is none need to give it a rest. Public education is one of the pillars of our free society. We support it with tax dollars because we appreciate its inherent value. We should worry when the president is not interested in promoting education."

So it's come to this? People fear a president's interest in public education so much they'll pull their kids out of class?

a good read from the teacher - bush's speech
http://www.individual.com/story.php?story=106506344
trumain wrote on Sep 8, '09
Liberals invade D.O.E. and use it as a weapon against America's youth...A first in American history...And those liberal fascists are proud of their efforts to destroy America's republic!
booboosoo wrote on Sep 8, '09
this whole thing is just weird. why would students need permission to watch/listen to the president of the US
They don't. These people just want to do EVERYTHING to discredit someone who actually GIVES A DAMN about the US.
booboosoo wrote on Sep 8, '09
In that case, the controversy should have ended and the threats of pulling kids out of school quelled when they pulled the lesson plan suggestion, right?

This was a trap by the White House: "How can we get the Republicans to come out AGAINST a Stay in School speech?" The GOP fell for it. The Right got played...
omg sheeple..........think!
kenr61 wrote on Sep 8, '09
OK my head is about to explode at that logic. How does tripling in six months the debt that the Republican administration racked up over 8 years force us to pay off what we already owed. That's like saying you;re going to be forced to pay down your Visa debt by running up just as much on Mastercard, Discover and AmEx
While I have little sympathy for those who seek to legislate, but head exploding is quite apt for someone who is expected to provide protection in the form of funding for two wars, repair a long ignored infrastructure, do something about standing room only classrooms, save existing jobs while creating new ones, increasing fire and police protection and do something about all these starving souls we trip over on our way to work and instead of paying for all of this they want tax breaks or to push the cost off onto the next few generations. The bill didn't triple, the full cost came due. How is it that ignoring cost or not fixing problems equals balancing the budget?

My State is a prime example of exactly how this fuzzy math got us in deeper. We got riped of in a energy scheme at the state level at the same time we were going to support local governments with an unpopular ( is there such a thing as a "popular" tax?), but one of the most fair taxes (a car tax is fairer than "vice" taxes or even property taxes. If a person can afford a luxury vehicle then they can afford a luxury tax, those buying economy will pay economy) that would have freed up the state to concentrate on its own bleeding wallet. A really bad actor acted as if he had the solution and convinced the people he could do better by repealing that tax and replacing the local funds out of state coffers (which were already empty because of the energy scam). The ante of this shell game was taken up a notch when the economy of the nation went south and federal funds were no longer a given. Twice he was denied just pushing the debt off on future generations and so he did the only thing he could think of, threaten to close the only state services making money for the state to save costs (like I said, he's an actor, not an accountant).

You take this logic and put it on the national scale and then ask me why I'm an independent.
meathookcook wrote on Sep 8, '09
ken, the deficit spending by the Obama Administration is NEW spending. It's not paying down the deficit. It's not paying off any loans or otherwise. It's entirely new spending largely going to special interest groups who got him elected.

Increasing Fire and Police protection isn't the Federal Govt's job. Fixing Infrastructure is only the Federal Govt's job for Interstate transportation. These starving souls you speak of have the highest standard of living for those that live in poverty anywhere in the world but still, not a Federal Problem. This is one of the reasons why the our country is bleeding red ink so badly. The Federal Govt his insinuated itself into every issue and siphons money off the top before any local governments or agencies see the money that could be going to actually help people.

BTW your example of California's getting hosed by Enron is a great example why I don't want the Government involved in health care. When someone doesn't have some of their own skin on the table they aren't as concerned about doing what's best for everyone.
bastiat2 wrote on Sep 8, '09
If Hussein cares soo much about the U.S. why is he destroying the economy?
adrisanitarium wrote on Sep 8, '09
omg sheeple..........think!
I have no idea if this comment was actually directed at me or what...

Very mysterious...
briangriffith wrote on Sep 8, '09
I guess a "bad faith" conversation is one where we believe the other person's words are just a smoke screen to hide their real intentions. Like, if you say people need better public education, and I'm absolutely sure that your real aim is to lock my family in a concentration camp.
adrisanitarium wrote on Sep 8, '09
I guess a "bad faith" conversation is one where we believe the other person's words are just a smoke screen to hide their real intentions. Like, if you say people need better public education, and I'm absolutely sure that your real aim is to lock my family in a concentration camp.
Great comment.

This whole thing is quite possibly the most hilarious controversy in my lifetime. It really should get some of Obama's critics thinking about how they pick their battles... I'm not sure if this controversy was a) insincere or b) sincere but stupid.
conservatress wrote on Sep 8, '09, edited on Sep 8, '09
This whole thing is quite possibly the most hilarious controversy in my lifetime.
And I find it one of the saddest, as the media has chosen to inform their followers that the controversy is about the speech itself, and not the attempt by the Department of Education to have the NEA and AFT engage in an overt attempt at indoctrination.

The point of contention was the indoctrination, not the words of the speech. But the media has redefined it, and that is all that those who like their news filtered into one minute segments know about it.
adrisanitarium wrote on Sep 8, '09
I would prefer he address the falling dollar, which his programs are exacerbating, rather than the students.
My mistake, then. I was unaware of the President only being able to address one issue per year.

By all means, economic issues should come first... Wait.... Are you POSITIVE he can't give a speech to kids and then go work on economic issues later in the day?

Ha...

Seriously, though, I really DO believe that the loyal opposition should learn how to pick its battles a bit better.
adrisanitarium wrote on Sep 8, '09
If Hussein cares soo much about the U.S. why is he destroying the economy?
Beinig an optimist, I believe it is possible for one to care DEEPLY about the United States and STILL manage to screw it up royally...
bastiat2 wrote on Sep 8, '09
I don't think dealing with two issues simultaneously is within his capacity. Frankly I don't believe he could chew gum and fart. I've looked at this loser's hole card and I would just love to play poker with him.
adrisanitarium wrote on Sep 8, '09, edited on Sep 8, '09
I don't think dealing with two issues simultaneously is within his capacity. Frankly I don't believe he could chew gum and fart. I've looked at this loser's hole card and I would just love to play poker with him.
Haha... Well, now you're just being insincere.

As of 2007, the executive branch of our federal government employed approximately 4,193,144 people. I'm going to stick with my theory that they can write a speech for school kids AND manage to further endanger our economy at the same time.

The Bush opponents used to make this same mistake in logic: He was a portrayed as a complete moron who STILL managed to cleverly subvert EVERYTHING that the smart guys tried to do.

When our discussion of politics and social policy digresses to "I don't think the President can chew gum and fart," maybe we need to stop pretending what it doing has anything to do with politics or country. I'm frankly not sure what that is... Weird, man, weird.
meathookcook wrote on Sep 8, '09
I believe it is possible for one to care DEEPLY about the United States and STILL manage to screw it up royally...
Sounds like the story of my life
goodstuff4u wrote on Sep 8, '09
But I’m here today because I have something important to discuss with you. I’m here because I want to talk with you about your education and what’s expected of all of you

FEAR SELLS -


The Republican strategy was based on nothing but fear. Fear of change, fear of hope, fear of a skinny man with a funny name. Fear of socialism, fear of a tax increase, fear of government. Fear of anything that looked, sounded, or might be perceived as foreign. It was an offensive, demagogic strategy that is tearing America apart.


THE FEAR OF CHANGE, THE BIG BLOGGING PICTURE


 

goodstuff4u wrote on Sep 8, '09
AS A BLOGGER, ARE YOU FIXING THE PROBLEM ARE MAKING IT WORST?

There were quit a few people that made the problem worst by finger pointing and playing "pop" politics.
http://goodstuff4u.multiply.com/journal/item/137/President_Barack_Obama_and_the_ECONOMY
goodstuff4u wrote on Sep 8, '09
trumain said
Liberals invade D.O.E. and use it as a weapon against America's youth...A first in American history...And those liberal fascists are proud of their efforts to destroy America's republic!
President Franklin Delano Roosevelt:
His First Inaugural Address
"This is preeminently the time to speak the truth, the whole truth, frankly and boldly. Nor need we shrink from honestly facing conditions in our country today." "So, first of all, let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself—nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance."

goodstuff4u wrote on Sep 8, '09
trumain said
Since you are obviously not real bright permit me to enlighten you
President Harry Truman
As Senator Joseph McCarthy's campaign against State Department and Justice Department officials continued...
President Harry Truman spoke against "scare mongers and hate mongers" who "are trying to create fear and suspicion among us by the use of slander, unproved accusations, and just plain lies."

goodstuff4u wrote on Sep 8, '09
Frankly I don't believe he could chew gum and fart.

what happens when you swallow gum

adrisanitarium wrote on Sep 9, '09
President Harry Truman
As Senator Joseph McCarthy's campaign against State Department and Justice Department officials continued...
President Harry Truman spoke against "scare mongers and hate mongers" who "are trying to create fear and suspicion among us by the use of slander, unproved accusations, and just plain lies."

Haha... See, I think that Obama critics in general have some good points.

And let's run with the Hitler comparisons for a second: Had Hitler's critics focused on criticizing, say, his television viewing habits, then they wouldn't have necessarily been doing anybody any favors.

It's really the genocide and invasions ya wanna focus on, not the wisdom of his summer wardrobe.
goodstuff4u wrote on Sep 9, '09
Very mysterious...
Ari - knowing Booboosoo for a long time - I think she was supporting your comment and your thinking - it could of very well been a trap - something had to be done - great thinking on your part
redstaterandy wrote on Sep 9, '09
Is this the peoples cube?

Good stuff.
goodstuff4u wrote on Sep 9, '09
Is this the peoples cube?
not sure - I have not checked their site in about a week - this is some thing I have been thinking about for a while - They have some good bloggers, will check this afternoon
BTW - THANKS
goodstuff4u wrote on Sep 9, '09
It's really the genocide and invasions ya wanna focus on, not the wisdom of his summer wardrobe.
good point - can't see the forest due to the trees
goodstuff4u wrote on Sep 9, '09
And let's run with the Hitler comparisons for a second:
justalilwitchie wrote on Sep 9, '09
And yet the lesson plan that asked the children to write letters about how they could help the president was quickly changed wasnt it?

So if they (the department of education) didnt see it as bad I.E. some form of political indoctornation, why where they so quick to change the lesson plan?

Because they realized they had f'd up! Thats why and they saw the lesson plan for what it was! Politics in our schools!

justalilwitchie wrote on Sep 9, '09, edited on Sep 9, '09
BTW, are we sure that wasnt the second draft of Obama's speech after all the upset and protest? No we are not. We are sure of nothing that comes out of the White House anymore.

How can you trust a man who calls for transparency in his presidential campaign...yet has so much covered up in his own past? In the type of friends he keeps, his own background...

How can you trust a man who avows to being a christian during his presidential campaign (with a questionable pastor), then once elected becomes a Muslim!

Its no wonder so many people dont trust this guy!
justalilwitchie wrote on Sep 9, '09
Mike Hewitt isnt sharing his blog with anyone...so its stupid to list it like you are. No one can read the bloody thing but friends and family...LOL
goodstuff4u wrote on Sep 9, '09
Mike Hewitt isnt sharing his blog with anyone...so its stupid to list it like you are. No one can read the bloody thing but friends and family...LOL
mike and I share a lot of the same friends
goodstuff4u wrote on Sep 9, '09
Is this the peoples cube?


yeah Randy - the peoples cude has a great blog about this stuff


http://thepeoplescube.com/red/viewtopic.php?t=3848

goodstuff4u wrote on Sep 9, '09
There may be a lesson plan for grown-ups in the contrived controversy about Barack Obama's back-to-school pep talk to students. It would be to do your homework, just as the president told the pupils.

And one formerly outraged Republican, Florida state GOP chairman Jim Greer, who had said the president was trying to promote socialist ideology, relented after reading the text and said it was appropriate

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090909/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_obama_school_daze_analysis
spaceeagle wrote on Sep 9, '09, edited on Sep 9, '09
trumain said
Since you are obviously not real bright permit me to enlighten you.
Obviously, trumain, YOU aren't real bright:

The lesson plans – one plan for pre-K-6 students and another plan for students in grades 7-12 – provided specific activities and assignments for children to do before, during, and after the president’s speech. The pre-k-6 plan instructs teachers to ask children “Why is it important that we listen to the President and other elected officials…” It further directs teachers to have children consider the following while listening to Obama’s speech:

* “What is the President trying to tell me?”
* “What is the President asking me to do?”
* “What new ideas and actions is the President challenging me to think about?”

The plan continues, “Students can record important parts of the speech where the President is asking them to do something. Students might think about: What specific job is he asking me to do…Are we able to do what President Obama is asking of us?”

This is normal discussion for GOOD teachers with students on ANYTHING they've seen or read, especially in literature. Perhaps you haven't been fortunate enough to have had an education yourself, though, so perhaps I shouldn't be too hard on you.
spaceeagle wrote on Sep 9, '09, edited on Sep 9, '09
trumain said
Liberals invade D.O.E. and use it as a weapon against America's youth...A first in American history...And those liberal fascists are proud of their efforts to destroy America's republic!
trumain, you are talking so far out of your posterior that it's stinking up the whole site. There have been speeches by presidents presented at schools my whole life. The first one I recall was one by President Kennedy when I was in 1st grade. Teachers would bring in televisions from the audio/visual department for important speeches by EVERY president. As I said, though, perhaps you weren't fortunate enough to have an education.

Oh, and at least I'm man enough to show my face.

conservatress wrote on Sep 9, '09
The lesson plans – one plan for pre-K-6 students and another plan for students in grades 7-12 – provided specific activities and assignments for children to do before, during, and after the president’s speech.
Exactly the point. The Dept of Ed forwarded these lesson plans to schools with a set of questions and activities that some teachers bristled about because they felt uncomforable with it. Administrators and Boards of education got upset because the federal Dept of Ed bypassed them with a set of instructions that were written to sound like the projects were mandates instead of optinal suggestions.

The information was hastily changed in the face of the opposition to federalism of the educational system. If the questions were so innocent and benign why recontruct the curicculum over night to deflect the sh*t storm they stirred up... why not do what this administration usually does in the face of opposition (besides blame Bush) and dig their heels in to fight for what they want?

Because they crossed the line and they know it. The speech was posted as a straw man effort to change the controversy to Obama speaking from the Dept of Ed questions being out of line.
alterb4ego wrote on Sep 9, '09
I loved the speech........but I'd have wanted to be in the classroom for what followed as well.......and frankly, hiring a self avowed marxist into your administration, listening to a preacher who hates the US for twenty years.....hanging with Ayers, who hates america......taking over banks and car companies and firing CEOs? Telling people you wont raise taxes on them while trying to pass bills that raise taxes on goods and services? Come on dude.......wake up. Course you dont have too.......you dont live here now do you?
goodstuff4u wrote on Sep 9, '09
Come on dude.......wake up. Course you dont have too.......you dont live here now do you?
no but I hold a American passport - did my military time - paid taxes for a long time
spaceeagle wrote on Sep 9, '09
Exactly the point. The Dept of Ed forwarded these lesson plans to schools with a set of questions and activities that some teachers bristled about because they felt uncomforable with it. Administrators and Boards of education got upset because the federal Dept of Ed bypassed them with a set of instructions that were written to sound like the projects were mandates instead of optinal suggestions.
If teachers aren't asking these kinds of questions of their students, then perhaps there NEEDS to be a federal mandate. These kinds of questions help the student determine whether or not the student is comprehending what was said. It helps the students to realize whether or not they were paying attention or comprehending as well. I suppose next you'll be screaming that it's unconstitutional for children to be tested in school. No wonder so many Republicans seem so un-educated.
cailet wrote on Sep 9, '09
I am disheartened that folks fall for the propaganda that is circulating at present.

But it is inevitable. It matters not which side is in power, the other demonizes the one in power..

The very same folk who were screaming about the left's portrayal of Bush when he was in power, are the ones believing this stuff.

Sad really.

Don't you people realize that all of this trash is just a distraction from tuning into to the issues that are important?


If you want to participate in the governing of this country, in a real way, watch CSPAN. There you can see exactly what is said and what is being proposed without a new media spin on it. Read the bills. Write or call your congress person's office.


Otheriwse, you are just part of the machine that dumbs us down!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

adrisanitarium wrote on Sep 9, '09, edited on Sep 9, '09
I think the average kid is barraged with thousands - yes, thousands - of messages every day, from ads on billboards to internet ads to television and subtle propaganda in textbooks.

I was. YOU were, if you're young and competent enough to be reading THIS. Compared to most all of the commercial messages, the Obama thing was lightweight. How many of those messages do kids affect the potential listeners or viewers?

Plus, does anyone REMEMBER when they were a kid in school? I saw a guy on television today saying he heard kids yesterday talking about how touched they were that the President cared enough to tell them to stay in school - What planet were these folks interviewing kids on? I want to know where the 11-year olds are who would find that cool enough to listen?

conservatress and her ilk are insincere. They don't really believe Obama did anything wrong. They oppose FIRST and think SECOND. Last week, they decided that Obama talking to schoolkids was the equivalent of child molestation, and then when the harmless speech came out, they felt obligated to continue to find fault.

It's okay. A stopped clock is right twice a day, but the vast majority of the time, it's wrong...
conservatress wrote on Sep 9, '09
conservatress and her ilk are insincere. They don't really believe Obama did anything wrong. They oppose FIRST and think SECOND.
I'll try to use small words so you understand.

The idea of Obama giving a speech to children encouraging them to stay in school was not the issue.

The issue was, and always was, the Department of Education's follow up indoctrination.

The DNC and MSM are trying to redefine the issue, to make the President's speech the point of contention and trying to gloss over the debacle caused by the Dept of Ed by bypassing local BOE's and goign directly into the schools.

You and your ilk are upset because people like me will not allow you to redefine the issue. The facts are established, you cannot change them.
adrisanitarium wrote on Sep 9, '09, edited on Sep 9, '09
I'll try to use small words so you understand.

The idea of Obama giving a speech to children encouraging them to stay in school was not the issue.

The issue was, and always was, the Department of Education's follow up indoctrination.

The DNC and MSM are trying to redefine the issue, to make the President's speech the point of contention and trying to gloss over the debacle caused by the Dept of Ed by bypassing local BOE's and goign directly into the schools.

You and your ilk are upset because people like me will not allow you to redefine the issue. The facts are established, you cannot change them.
I don't know what "my ilk" is. I wish I had me some ilk, actually.

Instead, we just end up with people so wedded to a narrow point of view that they are unable to even come close to critical thinking.
cailet wrote on Sep 9, '09
You mean like the indoctrination that has been in schools since the 80's that rewrite history?



It's all indoctrination... It is up to parents to guide their children...
goodstuff4u wrote on Sep 9, '09
trying to gloss over the debacle caused by the Dept of Ed by bypassing local BOE's and goign directly into the schools.
the reason it is being "gloss over" is because it's not a big deal

the first set of questions were good and fair questions. in other words, they were not a big deal. people were making a problem when there was none
goodstuff4u wrote on Sep 9, '09
Thirteen years after Obama's "Back to School" speech, another controversy ensues

Dateline September 08, 2022
Reagan City, C. D
The White House

President and Premier Sarah Palin has announced this morning that she will be giving a speech tomorrow from the Oval Office to be aired, via satellite, to all public and private schools. The speech, tentatively entitled, “The Glorious Conservative Revolution and Your Responsibilities to the Cause,” will be required viewing and will begin shortly after the Pledge of Allegiance to the New Republic is completed.

Meanwhile, an underground organization, the ACLU – made illegal several years ago by the New Right Constitution -- has begun a sinister campaign against Mrs. Palin’s speech, claiming that such indoctrination is unethical. Minister of Information, Rush Limbaugh counters that communist infiltration has made the group, not only illegal, but irrelevant. “If they don’t like the idea of the President and Premier speaking to America’s children, they should pack their things and go,” said the Minister, adding, “They will, of course, leave the children.”

Shortly before his arrest on “pre-criminal social endangerment” charges, Examiner reporter Jorge Luna queried whether the government should complain about the controversy considering the fight put up 13 years ago when Barack Obama gave a “Stay in School” speech also aimed at children. Limbaugh responded again, informing this reporter that the mention of “that black spot in American history, pun intended, is also illegal.”

Conservatives are being encouraged to celebrate the speech, and the anniversary of the Great Liberal Purge, by beating a gay person, an abortion doctor, or a minority (Check to assure they are not a party member first), or by contributing to the Committee to Re-Elect the President/Premier (CREEP). Donations are tax-deductible and count towards the mandatory minimum obligation.

In other political news, in response to the still-faltering economy, the National Right-Wing Assembly has announced further tax cuts on those earning $250K or more. The effective rate will be lowered, effective tommorrow to 1.5%. Treasury Minister Sanford announced the rate change saying, “It’s time that we rich folk stop paying our hard-earned money into the national coffers when less-influential and less-important people still have extra money in their pockets.”

h/t http://www.examiner.com/x-948-Miami-Law--Politics-Examiner~y2009m9d8-Thirteen-years-after-Obama
goodstuff4u wrote on Sep 9, '09
The Dept of Ed forwarded these lesson plans to schools with a set of questions and activities that some teachers bristled about because they felt uncomforable with it.
This is what started the backlash from parents. This article has the link to the "Teacher lesson plan", which starts off with;

Who is the President of the United States?

What do you think it takes to be President?

To whom do you think the President is going to be speaking?

Why do you think he wants to speak to you?

What do you think he will say to you?

Truly, I think this speaks for itself.

There are people who were literally scared that there was an associated lesson plan that asked "Who is the President of the United States?" Think about that. No wonder they love Sarah Palin.

the set of leason plan did not read like a mandate
conservatress wrote on Sep 9, '09
This article has the link to the "Teacher lesson plan
So does my blog which you linked to. These are not the original questions, these are the redrawn curricula.
bastiat2 wrote on Sep 9, '09

what happens when you swallow gum

Great stuff goodstuff!
bastiat2 wrote on Sep 9, '09
If Hussein isn't stupid (and I don't think he is) then he is deliberately destroying the economy (or making the senseless attempt to restructure the economy in the marxist mold) while trashing whatever remnants remain of The Constitution.
adrisanitarium wrote on Sep 9, '09, edited on Sep 9, '09
This is what started the backlash from parents. This article has the link to the "Teacher lesson plan", which starts off with;
I talked to a couple principals in Houston because, well, I was getting calls from people about whether there was a way that they could sue to stop their kid from hearing the speech.

The principals were not getting complaints about Department of Education procedures or tactics. They were getting angry calls saying that Obama was going to spread propaganda to make their kid Muslim or socialist.

For folks to go back after the fact and try to create a new, potentially legitimate argument about why they might have opposed it is insincere, like I've said.

They should just let it go. They look like fools this time out. It's okay. Win some, lose some...
Comment deleted at the request of the author.
bastiat2 wrote on Sep 9, '09
Really?

But like two comments back, you said he couldn't chew gum and fart...

Furthermore, if you believe he is deliberately destroying the economy, why would you prefer that he be focusing on the economy? If he's out to destroy it, shouldn't we WANT him to be doing ANYTHING other than working on the economy?
Because like all marxists he is ignorant...

And regarding the economy....it should be priority number one, the rest is superfluous....simply stated; nobody gets it if there ain't any!
goodstuff4u wrote on Sep 9, '09
I talked to a couple principals in Houston because, well, I was getting calls from people about whether there was a way that they could sue to stop their kid from hearing the speech.

The principals were not getting complaints about Department of Education procedures or tactics. They were getting angry calls saying that Obama was going to spread propaganda to make their kid Muslim or socialist.

For folks to go back after the fact and try to create a new, potentially legitimate argument about why they might have opposed it is insincere, like I've said.

They should just let it go. They look like fools this time out. It's okay. Win some, lose some...
wow - I am impressed - smart enough to call a lawyer but thought Obama was going to spread propaganda to make their kid a muslim or socialist. Well Houston is in the middle of the bible belt
goodstuff4u wrote on Sep 9, '09
I talked to a couple principals in Houston because, well, I was getting calls from people about whether there was a way that they could sue to stop their kid from hearing the speech
just talked to the wife about this - ok Thailand can get weird but this stuff would never happen here
conservatress wrote on Sep 9, '09
For folks to go back after the fact and try to create a new, potentially legitimate argument about why they might have opposed it is insincere, like I've said.
Actually no one has had create a new argument, although that hasn;t stopped liberals and the MSM. The DOE program has been the only legitimate argument has been all along. I cannot speak for the Alex Jones or Lyndon LaRouche followers who are knee jerk reactionaries, I can only speak for myself as I trouble to learn the issues.

Speaking of learning the issues... you might want to try that sometime.
adrisanitarium wrote on Sep 9, '09, edited on Sep 9, '09
Speaking of learning the issues... you might want to try that sometime.
See, this like this is why there is so rarely a discussion of the issues that we all claim to care so deeply about.

You're not here for issues. You're here to insult people.

If you can't have a discussion without a constant stream of insults - and every single one of your comments to me included insults - then please direct your spray of drool elsewhere.
starfishred wrote on Sep 9, '09
trumain said
Since you are obviously not real bright permit me to enlighten you. When the lesson plan was sent to principals on September 3, 2000 it read like a campaign advertisement for “the One” without and discernable inspiration for the kids above wash your hands and keep trying. All the rest was praise on high to Obama. As these talking points were all parents had to go on the questions started…The talking points have been revised twice since the White House finally posted the text after noon on Monday. Amazingly it looks in sharp contrast to the original talking points…How many times in all the criticism do you think that got re-writen?
The last “ruler” that took over large industry, the banks, health care, bankrupt his country…BUT…He did get the trains to run on time. And he was not a communists, no Benito Mussolini was no communists…A despotic Fascist Yes, but not a communists!
Educated Americans remember Obama’s campaign pledge to the effect that America is the greatest nation in the world, and he intended to change that! They also know that capitalism and free markets made America the strongest and richest country in the world.
And they don’t want to lose that to a Fascist Oligarchy as demonstrated by Obama and the admitted Communists he surrounds himself with.
you are really gulible we really don't need you do we-wow you are really well how can I put this in a friendly way so easy to indoctrinate sad really sad that people like you get a word in-
starfishred wrote on Sep 9, '09
trumain said
Since you are obviously not real bright permit me to enlighten you. When the lesson plan was sent to principals on September 3, 2000 it read like a campaign advertisement for “the One” without and discernable inspiration for the kids above wash your hands and keep trying. All the rest was praise on high to Obama. As these talking points were all parents had to go on the questions started…The talking points have been revised twice since the White House finally posted the text after noon on Monday. Amazingly it looks in sharp contrast to the original talking points…How many times in all the criticism do you think that got re-writen?
The last “ruler” that took over large industry, the banks, health care, bankrupt his country…BUT…He did get the trains to run on time. And he was not a communists, no Benito Mussolini was no communists…A despotic Fascist Yes, but not a communists!
Educated Americans remember Obama’s campaign pledge to the effect that America is the greatest nation in the world, and he intended to change that! They also know that capitalism and free markets made America the strongest and richest country in the world.
And they don’t want to lose that to a Fascist Oligarchy as demonstrated by Obama and the admitted Communists he surrounds himself with.
you also have the gall to insult the blog you take my breath away-
starfishred wrote on Sep 9, '09
Obviously, trumain, YOU aren't real bright:

The lesson plans – one plan for pre-K-6 students and another plan for students in grades 7-12 – provided specific activities and assignments for children to do before, during, and after the president’s speech. The pre-k-6 plan instructs teachers to ask children “Why is it important that we listen to the President and other elected officials…” It further directs teachers to have children consider the following while listening to Obama’s speech:

* “What is the President trying to tell me?”
* “What is the President asking me to do?”
* “What new ideas and actions is the President challenging me to think about?”

The plan continues, “Students can record important parts of the speech where the President is asking them to do something. Students might think about: What specific job is he asking me to do…Are we able to do what President Obama is asking of us?”

This is normal discussion for GOOD teachers with students on ANYTHING they've seen or read, especially in literature. Perhaps you haven't been fortunate enough to have had an education yourself, though, so perhaps I shouldn't be too hard on you.
well said spaceeeagle
kenr61 wrote on Sep 9, '09
Well yeah, I'll step up to the plate and admit ignorance on the subject. I had heard that Obama's speech was the problem and at no time did anyone mention that it was just an innocent ploy for additional material. Can anyone, without vague references or out of context snippets, give examples of this indoctrination?
conservatress wrote on Sep 9, '09
You're not here for issues. You're here to insult people.
Interestingly enough it is you who started with the insults... hypocrite. I merely enjoined you to trouble yourself to learn the facts before pontificating about them.
stuartsonofal wrote on Sep 9, '09
no excuse for not trying.

There is no excuse for not trying, is there Obama. http://stuartsonofal.multiply.com/journal especially when it is your duty under the LAW.
adrisanitarium wrote on Sep 9, '09, edited on Sep 9, '09
Interestingly enough it is you who started with the insults... hypocrite. I merely enjoined you to trouble yourself to learn the facts before pontificating about them.
I will interpret that as a "No, Adri, I cannot abide your reasonable and semi-polite request to direct my insults elsewhere."

Ah well.

Thanks anyway. Please drive through...
adrisanitarium wrote on Sep 9, '09
wow - I am impressed - smart enough to call a lawyer but thought Obama was going to spread propaganda to make their kid a muslim or socialist. Well Houston is in the middle of the bible belt
Well, you know... I think folks DO need to keep more than a watchful eye on the people in power. The people in power, when NOT watched, will try to get away with all sorts of nasty things.

Tyranny is real. As tyrannical statements go, however, "Stay in school" - or even "help the President improve education" - are pretty lightweight.
conservatress wrote on Sep 9, '09
I will interpret that as a
And I will interpret this as a "No Jesi, I will continue to throw down venom when I choose and when called on it claim to be the aggrieved instead of the aggressor."
goodstuff4u wrote on Sep 9, '09
EMAIL FROM AN OLD FRIEND

The older I get the more I realize that I had been fed so many myths over so long a time by so many in politics and in the media etc, and that for those on the left and those on the right, there is no sane talking to each other. Each side is fully convinced it has Truth on its side.

I steer away from posting on just about anything political so as to avoide getting truckloads of mail objecting to this or that post, but I like what you say here. The comments especially instructive on the split in American sensibilities.
thanks
spaceeagle wrote on Sep 9, '09
And I will interpret this as a "No Jesi, I will continue to throw down venom when I choose and when called on it claim to be the aggrieved instead of the aggressor."
You can't admit you're wrong, can you? It would kill you do admist such a thing, wouldn't it? I'd like to see you and all your other phony compadres come clean and have the gall to show your faces. You like anonymity, though, don't you? It helps you to cause all kinds of problems spouting phony horse manure.
spaceeagle wrote on Sep 9, '09
kenr61 wrote on Sep 9, '09
I'm so confused, I thought that RED states were FOR socialised medicine
Photobucket
adrisanitarium wrote on Sep 9, '09
And I will interpret this as a "No Jesi, I will continue to throw down venom when I choose and when called on it claim to be the aggrieved instead of the aggressor."
I am never the aggrieved.
adrisanitarium wrote on Sep 9, '09
You can't admit you're wrong, can you? It would kill you do admist such a thing, wouldn't it? I'd like to see you and all your other phony compadres come clean and have the gall to show your faces. You like anonymity, though, don't you? It helps you to cause all kinds of problems spouting phony horse manure.
When you feed the pigeons, they keep coming back.

I for one am not feeding them any longer.
spaceeagle wrote on Sep 10, '09
When you feed the pigeons, they keep coming back.
I just tell it like it is.
Comment deleted at the request of the author.
spaceeagle wrote on Sep 10, '09
Great cartoon!
cosmicrat wrote on Sep 14, '09
Amazing. You know what comes next, right? Book-burning. Or book-banning, anyway. They'll be marching on libraries demanding they be purged of any book with even a hit of a left-wing idea in it.
And if you're a teacher who tries to advocate things like logic abd critical thinking, well be prepared to be labeled subversive.
That's what happens when people become so afraid of ideas that they don't dare let their children hear them or read them
goodstuff4u wrote on Sep 14, '09
That's what happens when people become so afraid of ideas that they don't dare let their children hear them or read them


yeah- all ready happen in a small way - will it grow?

Comment deleted at the request of the author.
cosmicrat wrote on Sep 16, '09
http://www.ridiculopathy.com/news_detail.php?id=2386
Sarah's back...and she's got a Bic!
goodstuff4u wrote on Sep 17, '09
http://www.ridiculopathy.com/news_detail.php?id=2386
Sarah's back...and she's got a Bic!


So, get on out there and burn those books, everybody. Do what I say, so that I can become an all-powerful talk show host- and give voice to your fears and values, of course. I'm talkin' to my people about gettin' special "Sarah's Burn List" stickers to slap on the ones I selected and make them easier to find. Better still, don't buy the books before you burn them. Get them from the library, instead, which would save you lots of money. *wink*


h/t cosmicrat - thanks dude

goodstuff4u wrote on Oct 19, '09
kenr61 said
I'm so confused, I thought that RED states were FOR socialised medicine


REDS ARE COMIMG - THEY ARE EVERYWHERE

kenr61 wrote on Oct 19, '09
Photobucket
shariavigilant wrote on Oct 21, '09
You invited me to view your post from my own post here:

Goodbye, All That: How Left Idiocies Drove Me to Flee
by Ron Rosenbaum
http://geopolitics.multiply.com/journal/item/521?mark_read=geopolitics:journal:521&replies_read=4

In my post, Mr. Rosenbaum discusses why he is stepping away the left which he clearly views as, “A movement of Marxist fringe groups and people who are unable to make moral distinctions”.

I have read several other articles from Mr. Rosenbaum and he is by no stretch of the imagination a right-winger. As a matter of fact, in the article linked above he writes, “I want to make clear that saying goodbye to idiocies on the Left doesn’t mean becoming a conservative, neo- or otherwise”.

One of the most succinct paragraphs:
“Goodbye to the brilliant thinkers of the Left who believe it’s the very height of wit to make fun of George W. Bush’s intelligence—thereby establishing, of course, how very, very smart they are. Mr. Bush may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer (I think he’s more ill-informed and lazy than dumb). But they are guilty of a historical stupidity on a far greater scale, in their blind spot about Marxist genocides. It’s a failure of self-knowledge and intellectual responsibility that far outweighs Bush’s, because they’re supposed to be so very smart.”

Today, I find it surprising that one would go through such great lengths to accomplish what this post attempts to accomplish.

Even though in two of Obama’s campaign offices, the workers had flags of Che Guevara hanging on the walls, were they were wrong in drawing the parallel between Obama’s hopey-changy and Castro’s revolution?

Before something can be changed and made new, the old must be destroyed. This is revolution.

This is a “shut up” article. It is intended to shut dissidents up or at the very least, direct those “liberals” who just haven’t quite come to admit what their worldview actually represents to feel good about the current communist hopey-changy revolution.

It really is ok to come out of the closet and admit to it now. The proof is overwhelming and everywhere for all to see.


"Throwing history down the memory hole enables the Left to detach itself from past failures, appear forever fresh and new, and perpetuate an ideology that by virtue of natural selection should have perished long ago." ~ Daniel J. Flynn
goodstuff4u wrote on Oct 22, '09
In my post, Mr. Rosenbaum discusses why he is stepping away the left which he clearly views as, “A movement of Marxist fringe groups and people who are unable to make moral distinctions”.
Thanks for the OUTSTANDING comment
goodstuff4u wrote on Oct 22, '09
It really is ok to come out of the closet and admit to it now. The proof is overwhelming and everywhere for all to see.

FOX NEWS IS GETTING THERE ASS KICK !


Factor Fox News isn't just bad. It's un-American.


NEWSWEEK : Published Oct 17, 2009


From the magazine issue dated Oct 26, 2009


 


"Any news organization that took its responsibilities seriously would take pains to cover presidential criticism fairly. It would regard doing so as itself a test of integrity. At Fox, by contrast, complaints of unfairness prompt only hoots of derision and demands for "evidence" that, when presented, is brushed off and ignored."


"That Rupert Murdoch may tilt the news rightward more for commercial than ideological reasons is beside the point. What matters is the way that Fox's model has invaded the bloodstream of the American media. By showing that ideologically distorted news can drive ratings"


 

Comment deleted at the request of the thread owner.
Comment deleted at the request of the thread owner.
Comment deleted at the request of the author.
Comment deleted at the request of the author.
spaceeagle wrote on Jan 28, '10
Typical right wing scare tactics.
goodstuff4u wrote on Jan 28, '10
What matters is the way that Fox's model has invaded the bloodstream of the American media. By showing that ideologically distorted news can drive ratings"

Part of The President's in State of the Union Address

"Unfortunately, too many of our citizens have lost faith that our biggest institutions -– our corporations, our media, and, yes, our government –- still reflect these same values.  Each of these institutions are full of honorable men and women doing important work that helps our country prosper.  But each time a CEO rewards himself for failure, or a banker puts the rest of us at risk for his own selfish gain, people's doubts grow.  Each time lobbyists game the system or politicians tear each other down instead of lifting this country up, we lose faith.  The more that TV pundits reduce serious debates to silly arguments, big issues into sound bites, our citizens turn away. " 

No wonder there's so much cynicism out there.  

WHAT ABOUT BLOGGERS ? RED BAITING - NEW RED SCARE?


goodstuff4u wrote on Jan 28, '10
"Any news organization that took its responsibilities seriously would take pains to cover presidential criticism fairly. It would regard doing so as itself a test of integrity. At Fox, by contrast, complaints of unfairness prompt only hoots of derision and demands for "evidence" that, when presented, is brushed off and ignored."
How can a few fringe people be right and the rest of the American government be covering up the issue. 

I don't know what's more ridiculous, the fact that these theories are mustered up, that people buy into them, or that they get picked up by otherwise legitimate news outlets.


Comment deleted at the request of the author.
starbrander wrote on Jul 8, '10
Scare Tactics Have No Party......It's Soft Core Terrorism
goodstuff4u wrote on Jul 8, '10
It's Soft Core Terrorism
starbrander wrote on Jul 8, '10
starbrander wrote on Jul 8, '10
dnoakes wrote on Jun 2, '11
I remember Obama's speech there and the scare tactics some in the GOP leveled at it. Thanks for posting the whole of his remarks.
Add a Comment